ATI Radeon HD 4700 vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking216not rated
Place by popularity26not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.50no data
Power efficiency14.44no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGP106RV730
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 August 2016 (8 years ago)11 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152320
Core clock speed1506 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1708 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate123.019.20
Floating-point processing power3.935 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs7232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length250 mm193 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 August 2016 11 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1060 3 GB has an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4700, on the other hand, has 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and Radeon HD 4700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
ATI Radeon HD 4700
Radeon HD 4700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8656 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 20 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.