Quadro FX 370M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	328	not rated
Place by popularity	6	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.71	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	no data
GPU code name	N17P-G1	NB9M-GLM
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	25 October 2016 (7 years ago)	15 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	8
CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	1291 MHz	580 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	210 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	20 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	66.82	2.200
Floating-point performance	2.138 gflops	0.0224 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-II
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	9.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	25 October 2016	15 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	16 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	20 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---