Arctic Sound-M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking331not rated
Place by popularity5not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.03no data
Power efficiency15.00no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGP107Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7688192
Core clock speed1291 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt500 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.82230.4
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs48256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s1.23 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 500 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has 566.7% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 206993 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.