Radeon Pro VII vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	349	163
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	16.33
Power efficiency	14.01	9.23
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	Vega 20
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	3 January 2017 (8 years ago)	13 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	3840
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	1400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1700 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	77.76	408.0
Floating-point processing power	2.488 TFLOPS	13.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	48	240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	305 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	1024 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	56 −114%	120−130 +114%
1440p	25 −100%	50−55 +100%
4K	17 −106%	35−40 +106%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	15.83
1440p	no data	37.98
4K	no data	54.26

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	59 −103%	120−130 +103%
Far Cry 5	47 −113%	100−105 +113%
Fortnite	85−90 −112%	180−190 +112%
Forza Horizon 4	62 −110%	130−140 +110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	56 −114%	120−130 +114%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 −112%	70−75 +112%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	49 −104%	100−105 +104%
Dota 2	92 −117%	200−210 +117%
Far Cry 5	44 −116%	95−100 +116%
Fortnite	76 −111%	160−170 +111%
Forza Horizon 4	57 −111%	120−130 +111%
Grand Theft Auto V	55 −118%	120−130 +118%
Metro Exodus	19 −111%	40−45 +111%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	52 −112%	110−120 +112%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −116%	80−85 +116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 −113%	100−105 +113%
World of Tanks	190−200 −104%	400−450 +104%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	42 −114%	90−95 +114%
Dota 2	86 −109%	180−190 +109%
Far Cry 5	40 −113%	85−90 +113%
Forza Horizon 4	43 −109%	90−95 +109%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	39 −118%	85−90 +118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 −112%	55−60 +112%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

54
−104%

110−120

+104%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −117%	50−55 +117%
Metro Exodus	12 −100%	24−27 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	29 −107%	60−65 +107%
Far Cry 5	26 −112%	55−60 +112%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −116%	80−85 +116%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

−119%

70−75
+119%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −112%	55−60 +112%
Metro Exodus	7 −100%	14−16 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −106%	35−40 +106%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Dota 2	27−30 −104%	55−60 +104%
Far Cry 5	12 −100%	24−27 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −111%	95−100 +111%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

9
−100%

18−20

+100%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Pro VII compete in popular games:

Pro VII is 114% faster in 1080p
Pro VII is 100% faster in 1440p
Pro VII is 106% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.26	33.53
Recency	3 January 2017	13 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	250 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Pro VII, on the other hand, has a 119.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro VII is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon Pro VII is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.