RTX A2000 12 GB vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile with RTX A2000 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.39

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking342139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data87.69
Power efficiency14.2535.17
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107GA106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)23 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683328
Core clock speed1493 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt70 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.76124.8
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs48104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
−114%
120−130
+114%
1440p25
−120%
55−60
+120%
4K17
−106%
35−40
+106%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
−121%
95−100
+121%
Battlefield 5 59
−120%
130−140
+120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
−113%
100−105
+113%
Far Cry 5 47
−113%
100−105
+113%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
−117%
100−105
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 62
−126%
140−150
+126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−127%
75−80
+127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
−118%
85−90
+118%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
−130%
85−90
+130%
Battlefield 5 49
−124%
110−120
+124%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
−127%
75−80
+127%
Far Cry 5 44
−127%
100−105
+127%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
−126%
95−100
+126%
Forza Horizon 4 57
−128%
130−140
+128%
Metro Exodus 19
−111%
40−45
+111%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−126%
95−100
+126%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−127%
75−80
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
−113%
100−105
+113%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 23
−117%
50−55
+117%
Battlefield 5 42
−126%
95−100
+126%
Far Cry 5 40
−125%
90−95
+125%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−124%
85−90
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−121%
95−100
+121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−112%
55−60
+112%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
−114%
45−50
+114%
Metro Exodus 12
−125%
27−30
+125%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−120%
55−60
+120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−106%
35−40
+106%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Battlefield 5 29
−124%
65−70
+124%
Far Cry 5 26
−112%
55−60
+112%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
−122%
60−65
+122%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−125%
180−190
+125%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4
−125%
9−10
+125%
Metro Exodus 7
−129%
16−18
+129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
−125%
18−20
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−106%
35−40
+106%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Far Cry 5 12
−125%
27−30
+125%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
−108%
27−30
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 114% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 120% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 106% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.39 35.45
Recency 3 January 2017 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A2000 12 GB has a 130.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 810 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 135 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.