Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile with Quadro FX 4800, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.30
+500%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile outperforms FX 4800 by a whopping 500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking347826
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.05
Power efficiency13.981.16
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGP107GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)11 November 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768192
Core clock speed1493 MHz602 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.7638.53
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPS0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs4864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s800 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s76.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA+1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+522%
9−10
−522%
1440p25
+525%
4−5
−525%
4K17
+750%
2−3
−750%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data199.89
1440pno data449.75
4Kno data899.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
+514%
7−8
−514%
Battlefield 5 59
+556%
9−10
−556%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+571%
7−8
−571%
Far Cry 5 47
+571%
7−8
−571%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
+557%
7−8
−557%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+520%
10−11
−520%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+560%
5−6
−560%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
+550%
6−7
−550%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
+517%
6−7
−517%
Battlefield 5 49
+513%
8−9
−513%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
+560%
5−6
−560%
Far Cry 5 44
+529%
7−8
−529%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
+500%
7−8
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+533%
9−10
−533%
Metro Exodus 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+500%
7−8
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
+560%
5−6
−560%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+571%
7−8
−571%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 23
+667%
3−4
−667%
Battlefield 5 42
+500%
7−8
−500%
Far Cry 5 40
+567%
6−7
−567%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+533%
6−7
−533%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+514%
7−8
−514%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+550%
4−5
−550%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
+600%
3−4
−600%
Metro Exodus 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+750%
2−3
−750%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Battlefield 5 29
+625%
4−5
−625%
Far Cry 5 26
+550%
4−5
−550%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
+575%
4−5
−575%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+567%
12−14
−567%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 0−1
Metro Exodus 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+750%
2−3
−750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Far Cry 5 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and FX 4800 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 522% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 525% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 750% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.30 2.55
Recency 3 January 2017 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has a 500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4800 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro FX 4800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Quadro FX 4800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 845 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 62 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.