Quadro FX 3800M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile with Quadro FX 3800M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.40
+927%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile outperforms FX 3800M by a whopping 927% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking346977
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.291.04
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP107G92
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)14 August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768128
Core clock speed1493 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.7643.20
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPS0.4224 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.40
+927%
FX 3800M 1.50

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 30690
+353%
FX 3800M 6779

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+64.7%
34
−64.7%
1440p25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
4K17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
+617%
6−7
−617%
Battlefield 5 59
+1080%
5−6
−1080%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+1075%
4−5
−1075%
Far Cry 5 47
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+1450%
4−5
−1450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
+388%
8−9
−388%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
+517%
6−7
−517%
Battlefield 5 49
+1125%
4−5
−1125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
+725%
4−5
−725%
Far Cry 5 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
+950%
4−5
−950%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Metro Exodus 19
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
+313%
8−9
−313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+327%
10−12
−327%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 23
+283%
6−7
−283%
Battlefield 5 42
+950%
4−5
−950%
Far Cry 5 40
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+975%
4−5
−975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+136%
10−12
−136%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
Metro Exodus 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Battlefield 5 29
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Far Cry 5 26
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1043%
7−8
−1043%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 0−1
Metro Exodus 7 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Far Cry 5 12 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and FX 3800M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 65% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 1150% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 1600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 2250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 22 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.40 1.50
Recency 3 January 2017 14 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has a 926.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3800M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 3800M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Quadro FX 3800M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 824 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.