Radeon RX 6400 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Place in the ranking	374	279
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	54.04
Power efficiency	12.66	25.61
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GP107	Navi 24
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	3 January 2018 (6 years ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	768
Core clock speed	1152 MHz	1923 MHz
Boost clock speed	1417 MHz	2321 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	53 Watt
Texture fill rate	68.02	111.4
Floating-point processing power	2.177 TFLOPS	3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 13.86

RX 6400 19.81
+42.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 5340

RX 6400 7632
+42.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	56 −42.9%	80−85 +42.9%
4K	18 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.99
4K	no data	6.63

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−36.4%

30−33
+36.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 −39.5%	60−65 +39.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Battlefield 5	46 −41.3%	65−70 +41.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −42.9%	40−45 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	48 −35.4%	65−70 +35.4%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −42.9%	130−140 +42.9%
Hitman 3	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −38.9%	100−105 +38.9%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −31.6%	50−55 +31.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80 −37.5%	110−120 +37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −33.3%	100−105 +33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	61 −39.3%	85−90 +39.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Battlefield 5	41 −34.1%	55−60 +34.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −42.9%	40−45 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	36 −38.9%	50−55 +38.9%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −42.9%	130−140 +42.9%
Hitman 3	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −38.9%	100−105 +38.9%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −31.6%	50−55 +31.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −33.3%	100−105 +33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −42.9%	40−45 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%
Forza Horizon 4	47 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Hitman 3	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −38.9%	100−105 +38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 −40%	35−40 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −33.3%	100−105 +33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−31.6%

50−55
+31.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −29.6%	35−40 +29.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −40.8%	100−105 +40.8%
Hitman 3	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −42.9%	40−45 +42.9%
Metro Exodus	29 −37.9%	40−45 +37.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −39.5%	120−130 +39.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−30.4%

30−33
+30.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10 −40%	14−16 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Hitman 3	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −39.7%	95−100 +39.7%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	20 −35%	27−30 +35%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−38.5%

18−20
+38.5%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and RX 6400 compete in popular games:

RX 6400 is 43% faster in 1080p
RX 6400 is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.86	19.81
Recency	3 January 2018	19 January 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	53 Watt

RX 6400 has a 42.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 41.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.