RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Max-Q
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
10.55

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms GTX 1050 Max-Q by a whopping 514% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking43029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.7834.67
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2018 (6 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6406144
Core clock speed1190 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1328 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate53.12417.6
Floating-point processing power1.7 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs40192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 10.55
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 64.82
+514%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 4073
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 25014
+514%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−514%
270−280
+514%
1440p25
−500%
150−160
+500%
4K14
−507%
85−90
+507%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−494%
95−100
+494%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
−495%
220−230
+495%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−494%
95−100
+494%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−506%
200−210
+506%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31
−513%
190−200
+513%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−494%
95−100
+494%
Far Cry 5 37
−495%
220−230
+495%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−486%
170−180
+486%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−471%
400−450
+471%
Hitman 3 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−514%
350−400
+514%
Metro Exodus 44
−514%
270−280
+514%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
−514%
270−280
+514%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
−456%
350−400
+456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−438%
350−400
+438%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−500%
150−160
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−494%
95−100
+494%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−506%
200−210
+506%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29
−486%
170−180
+486%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−494%
95−100
+494%
Far Cry 5 30
−500%
180−190
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−486%
170−180
+486%
Forza Horizon 4 97
−467%
550−600
+467%
Hitman 3 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−514%
350−400
+514%
Metro Exodus 35
−500%
210−220
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
−500%
180−190
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−488%
200−210
+488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−438%
350−400
+438%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
−494%
95−100
+494%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−494%
95−100
+494%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19
−479%
110−120
+479%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−494%
95−100
+494%
Far Cry 5 22
−491%
130−140
+491%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−471%
400−450
+471%
Hitman 3 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−514%
350−400
+514%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−488%
200−210
+488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
−471%
120−130
+471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−438%
350−400
+438%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 31
−513%
190−200
+513%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−494%
95−100
+494%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
−500%
60−65
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 11
−491%
65−70
+491%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−504%
290−300
+504%
Hitman 3 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Metro Exodus 24
−483%
140−150
+483%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−497%
400−450
+497%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20
−500%
120−130
+500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Hitman 3 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−496%
280−290
+496%
Metro Exodus 13
−477%
75−80
+477%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−477%
75−80
+477%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6
−483%
35−40
+483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6
−483%
35−40
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 6
−483%
35−40
+483%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10
−500%
60−65
+500%

This is how GTX 1050 Max-Q and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 514% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 507% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.55 64.82
Recency 3 January 2018 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 130 Watt

GTX 1050 Max-Q has 73.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 514.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is a notebook card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 250 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 36 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.