Arc 130T Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking396not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.06no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameGP107Arrow Lake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 May 2018 (6 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768896
Core clock speed1392 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1518 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate72.86123.2
Floating-point processing power2.332 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs2428
TMUs4856
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data7

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width96 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1752 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth84.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 May 2018 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 130T Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and Arc 130T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is a desktop card while Arc 130T Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
Intel Arc 130T Mobile
Arc 130T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 355 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB or Arc 130T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.