GeForce 410M vs GTS 450 Rev. 2

GTS 240 OEM GTS 250 GTS 450 GTS 450 OEM GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 3
VS
310M 405M 410M 610M 710M 820M 840M 920M 920MX 930MX 940M 940MX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 with GeForce 410M, including specs and performance data.

GTS 450 Rev. 2
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 106 Watt
4.41
+568%

GTS 450 Rev. 2 outperforms 410M by a whopping 568% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce 410M GeForce 410M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6661184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.903.84
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF116GF119
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 March 2011 (13 years ago)5 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19248
Core clock speed783 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate25.064.600
Floating-point processing power0.6013 TFLOPS0.1104 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPs164
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed902 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth57.73 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.6+
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+525%
8
−525%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTS 450 Rev. 2 and GeForce 410M compete in popular games:

  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 525% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 35 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.41 0.66
Recency 15 March 2011 5 January 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 12 Watt

GTS 450 Rev. 2 has a 568.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

GeForce 410M, on the other hand, has 783.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 410M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while GeForce 410M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 410M
GeForce 410M
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7750 Radeon HD 7750
GeForce 410M GeForce 410M
vs
HD Graphics 3000 HD Graphics 3000
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
GeForce 910M GeForce 910M
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7290 Radeon HD 7290
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
9800M GT GeForce 9800M GT
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
FX 1800M Quadro FX 1800M
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
HD 8490 OEM Radeon HD 8490 OEM
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
GT 640 OEM GeForce GT 640 OEM
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
GT 520 GeForce GT 520
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
R7 Graphics Radeon R7 Graphics
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 260 OEM GeForce GTX 260 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 39 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 267 votes

Rate GeForce 410M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.