Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs GeForce GTS 240 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.36
Power efficiencyno data7.03
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG92BNavi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1123840
Core clock speed675 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1967 MHz
Number of transistors754 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate37.80472.1
Floating-point processing power0.3629 TFLOPS15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs56240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Apple MPX
Length229 mm267 mm
Width1-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2009 3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 400 Watt

GTS 240 OEM has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800X Duo, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 240 OEM and Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 240 OEM is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 30 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 40 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.