GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs GTS 160M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking923not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Power efficiency2.05no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG94GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 March 2009 (15 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores642048
Core clock speed600 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1155 MHz
Number of transistors505 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2073.92
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
Gigaflops288no data
ROPs1632
TMUs3264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options2-way-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth51 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2009 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 30 Watt

RTX 2050 Max-Q has an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 712.5% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
GeForce GTS 160M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 143 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.