Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking491not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.07no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameN14P-?Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)23 November 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speed980 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data975 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data62.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.997 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHz1365 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data174.7 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 23 November 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 80 Watt

GT 755M SLI has 3900% lower power consumption.

R9 M290X Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.