Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking494not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.98no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameN14P-?Tahiti
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)31 January 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed980 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data38.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.229 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB3 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data240.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 31 January 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 85 Watt

GT 755M SLI has an age advantage of 1 year, and 4150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.