GeForce Go 6100 vs GT 755M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GT 755M SLI and GeForce Go 6100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GT 755M SLI outperforms Go 6100 by a whopping 21650% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 497 | 1483 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 6.00 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | no data |
| GPU code name | N14P-? | C51MV |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 November 2013 (11 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 3 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 425 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2x 1300 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2x ~50 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | shared Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | shared Memory |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 36 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+750%
|
2−3
−750%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+750%
|
2−3
−750%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+600%
|
5−6
−600%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
| Valorant | 30−35 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+750%
|
2−3
−750%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+640%
|
5−6
−640%
|
| Fortnite | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+600%
|
5−6
−600%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+1625%
|
4−5
−1625%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+550%
|
4−5
−550%
|
| Valorant | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 120−130
+1513%
|
8−9
−1513%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+750%
|
2−3
−750%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+640%
|
5−6
−640%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+600%
|
5−6
−600%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+1625%
|
4−5
−1625%
|
| Valorant | 30−35 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 60−65 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+300%
|
3−4
−300%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+450%
|
4−5
−450%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 8−9 | 0−1 |
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 755M SLI is 1625% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GT 755M SLI is ahead in 28 tests (97%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (3%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.70 | 0.04 |
| Recency | 1 November 2013 | 1 February 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 110 nm |
GT 755M SLI has a 21650% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6100 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
