GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs GT 755M Mac Edition

Place in the ranking	865	73
Place by popularity	not in top-100	56
Power efficiency	2.99	27.43
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GK107	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	8 November 2013 (11 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	3072
Core clock speed	1085 MHz	1545 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1890 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	34.72	181.4
Floating-point processing power	0.8333 TFLOPS	11.61 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	32	96
Tensor Cores	no data	96
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	3.0	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	5−6 −2120%	111 +2120%
1440p	2−3 −3000%	62 +3000%
4K	1−2 −3800%	39 +3800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	96 +0%	96 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	126 +0%	126 +0%
Elden Ring	134 +0%	134 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	95 +0%	95 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 +0%	50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	267 +0%	267 +0%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	80 +0%	80 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	42 +0%	42 +0%
Dota 2	149 +0%	149 +0%
Elden Ring	138 +0%	138 +0%
Far Cry 5	101 +0%	101 +0%
Fortnite	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	215 +0%	215 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	142 +0%	142 +0%
Metro Exodus	37 +0%	37 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	72 +0%	72 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 +0%	39 +0%
Dota 2	156 +0%	156 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	187 +0%	187 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	85 +0%	85 +0%
Elden Ring	106 +0%	106 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	85 +0%	85 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
World of Tanks	290−300 +0%	290−300 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45 +0%	45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +0%	24 +0%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	127 +0%	127 +0%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	76 +0%	76 +0%
Valorant	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	25 +0%	25 +0%
Dota 2	76 +0%	76 +0%
Elden Ring	52 +0%	52 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	76 +0%	76 +0%
Metro Exodus	37 +0%	37 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	76 +0%	76 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10 +0%
Dota 2	126 +0%	126 +0%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Fortnite	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	62 +0%	62 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

This is how GT 755M Mac Edition and RTX 4060 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Mobile is 2120% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Mobile is 3000% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Mobile is 3800% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.17	45.83
Recency	8 November 2013	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	115 Watt

GT 755M Mac Edition has 130% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2012% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.