GeForce GT 240 vs GT 750M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 750M SLI with GeForce GT 240, including specs and performance data.

GT 750M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB DDR3, GDDR5
6.91
+427%

GT 750M SLI outperforms GT 240 by a whopping 427% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5511022
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data1.37
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameN14P-GTGT215
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)17 November 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76896
Core clock speed967 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors1300 Million727 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data69 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105C C
Texture fill rateno data17.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2573 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB512 MB or 1 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 - 5000 MHz1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data54.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDVIVGAHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.2
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 750M SLI 6.91
+427%
GT 240 1.31

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 750M SLI 16142
+209%
GT 240 5221

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
+108%
25
−108%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+60.6%
30−35
−60.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+60.6%
30−35
−60.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+60.6%
30−35
−60.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Hitman 3 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 0−1
Hitman 3 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

This is how GT 750M SLI and GT 240 compete in popular games:

  • GT 750M SLI is 108% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 750M SLI is 2150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GT 750M SLI surpassed GT 240 in all 48 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.91 1.31
Recency 1 April 2013 17 November 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GT 750M SLI has a 427.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 750M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 240 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 750M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GT 240 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
GeForce GT 750M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 240

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 863 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.