Radeon Pro 5500M vs GeForce GT 740M

Place in the ranking	877	308
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.36	14.37
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GK208	Navi 14
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	20 June 2013 (11 years ago)	13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1536
Core clock speed	980 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	980 MHz	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	85 Watt
Texture fill rate	31.36	139.2
Floating-point processing power	0.7526 TFLOPS	4.454 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	32	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Standard memory configuration	DDR3/GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 740M 2.07

Pro 5500M 17.56
+748%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 740M 797

Pro 5500M 6774
+750%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 740M 1848

Pro 5500M 14725
+697%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 740M 1151

Pro 5500M 10399
+804%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 740M 7403

Pro 5500M 65776
+789%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	15 −293%	59 +293%
1440p	6−7 −833%	56 +833%
4K	3−4 −767%	26 +767%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−600%

27−30
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −471%	40−45 +471%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −5700%	55−60 +5700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −620%	35−40 +620%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −860%	45−50 +860%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1300%	110−120 +1300%
Hitman 3	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −383%	85−90 +383%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1775%	75 +1775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −480%	55−60 +480%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −471%	40−45 +471%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −5700%	55−60 +5700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −900%	50 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −860%	45−50 +860%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1300%	110−120 +1300%
Hitman 3	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −383%	85−90 +383%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1175%	51 +1175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −480%	55−60 +480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 −86.4%	40−45 +86.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −471%	40−45 +471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −600%	35 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1300%	110−120 +1300%
Hitman 3	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −383%	85−90 +383%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −480%	55−60 +480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4 −875%	39 +875%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1250%

54
+1250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1033%	30−35 +1033%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1800%	18−20 +1800%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −900%	20−22 +900%
Hitman 3	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −500%	35−40 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −945%	115 +945%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−600%

35
+600%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−1200%

12−14
+1200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	7−8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−433%

16
+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	32 +0%	32 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

27−30

+0%

27−30

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	41 +0%	41 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

This is how GT 740M and Pro 5500M compete in popular games:

Pro 5500M is 293% faster in 1080p
Pro 5500M is 833% faster in 1440p
Pro 5500M is 767% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 5500M is 5700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro 5500M is ahead in 54 tests (76%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.07	17.56
Recency	20 June 2013	13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	85 Watt

GT 740M has 88.9% lower power consumption.

Pro 5500M, on the other hand, has a 748.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 740M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 740M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.