GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs GT 710

Place in the ranking	955	243
Place by popularity	58	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	64.77
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GK208B	N18E-G0
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	27 March 2014 (10 years ago)	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$34.99	$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 161825% better value for money than GT 710.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	1536
CUDA cores	192	no data
Core clock speed	954 MHz	1140 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1335 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	60 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	95 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	15.26	128.2
Floating-point processing power	0.3663 gflops	4.101 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Height	2.713" (6.9 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1.8 GB/s	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA	No outputs
Multi monitor support	3 displays	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision	+	-
PureVideo	+	-
PhysX	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 710 1.63

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 22.85
+1302%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 710 629

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
+1301%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 710 947

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 13355
+1310%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 710 7270

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 63086
+768%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 710 70459

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 306910
+336%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	7 −1057%	81 +1057%
1440p	3 −900%	30 +900%
4K	8 −350%	36 +350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−825%

35−40
+825%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −833%	56 +833%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −1300%	70 +1300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −4500%	92 +4500%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2640%	130−140 +2640%
Hitman 3	6−7 −650%	45−50 +650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −569%	100−110 +569%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2967%	92 +2967%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −756%	75−80 +756%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −188%	95−100 +188%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −1220%	66 +1220%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3750%	77 +3750%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2640%	130−140 +2640%
Hitman 3	6−7 −650%	45−50 +650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −569%	100−110 +569%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2367%	74 +2367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 −1440%	75−80 +1440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −188%	95−100 +188%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −600%	42 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −900%	50 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2600%	54 +2600%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2640%	130−140 +2640%
Hitman 3	6−7 −650%	45−50 +650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −394%	79 +394%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 −1440%	75−80 +1440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3 −1600%	51 +1600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −188%	95−100 +188%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−2300%

72
+2300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2050%	40−45 +2050%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −2500%	24−27 +2500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Hitman 3	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 −880%	45−50 +880%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −1538%	130−140 +1538%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−850%

35−40
+850%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−1700%

18−20
+1700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	12−14
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 −440%	27−30 +440%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	10−11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−567%

20−22
+567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Battlefield 5	88 +0%	88 +0%
Metro Exodus	120 +0%	120 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Battlefield 5	84 +0%	84 +0%
Metro Exodus	95 +0%	95 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

35−40

+0%

35−40

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Hitman 3	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	31 +0%	31 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

This is how GT 710 and GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 1057% faster in 1080p
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 900% faster in 1440p
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 350% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 4500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 53 tests (76%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.63	22.85
Recency	27 March 2014	23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	60 Watt

GT 710 has 215.8% lower power consumption.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 1301.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 710 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.