GMA vs GeForce GT 710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 630 Rev. 2 GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GT 635 OEM GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 710
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GMA GMA 900 GMA 950 GMA 3000 GMA 3100 GMA 3150 GMA 3600 GMA 3650 GMA X3000 GMA X3100 GMA X4500M GMA X4500MHD

Contents

GT 710 GT 710
GMA GMA

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9611538
Place by popularity69not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency5.90no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameGK208Cloverview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 March 2014 (10 years ago)4 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$34.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed954 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors915 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.261.066
Floating-point processing power0.3663 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs162

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1.8 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGANo outputs
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
PureVideo+-
PhysX+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.5ES 2.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 710 626
+31200%
GMA 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8no data
1440p4no data
4K6no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.37no data
1440p8.75no data
4K5.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8 no data
Forza Horizon 5 5 no data
Metro Exodus 5 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 12 no data
Far Cry 5 15 no data
Fortnite 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 9 no data
Metro Exodus 4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
World of Tanks 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 18 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 no data

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 no data
World of Tanks 10−11 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5 no data
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 7−8 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 7 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5 no data
Valorant 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 27 March 2014 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

GT 710 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 710 and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 710 is a desktop card while GMA is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710
Intel GMA
GMA
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
ATI HD 2900 PRO Radeon HD 2900 PRO
GMA GMA
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
GT 720 GeForce GT 720
Picasso Radeon Picasso
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
TITAN Ada TITAN Ada
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
GTX 750 v2 GeForce GTX 750 v2
GTX 850M GTX 850M
vs
GTX TITAN X TITAN X
RX 560 XT Radeon RX 560 XT
vs
GT 720 GeForce GT 720
FirePro R5000 FirePro R5000
vs
GTX 745 OEM GeForce GTX 745 OEM
HD 6670A Radeon HD 6670A
vs
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
RX 5500M Radeon RX 5500M
vs
GTX 760 X2 GeForce GTX 760 X2
ATI 9700 Radeon 9700
vs
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
7300 SE GeForce 7300 SE
vs
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 4391 vote

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.