ATI FireGL X3-256 vs GeForce GT 710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking954not rated
Place by popularity83not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency5.98no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGK208R420
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 March 2014 (10 years ago)3 August 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$34.99 $1,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed954 MHz491 MHz
Number of transistors915 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt57 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.265.892
Floating-point processing power0.3663 TFLOPSno data
ROPs812
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8AGP 8x
Length145 mmno data
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1.8 GB/s454 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s29.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
PureVideo+-
PhysX+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 March 2014 3 August 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 57 Watt

GT 710 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 710 and FireGL X3-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 710 is a desktop card while FireGL X3-256 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710
ATI FireGL X3-256
FireGL X3-256

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 4224 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.