GeForce 7600 GT vs GT 645M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 645M with GeForce 7600 GT, including specs and performance data.

GT 645M
2012
2 GB DDR3\GDDR5, 32 Watt
2.42
+317%

GT 645M outperforms 7600 GT by a whopping 317% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8351201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.461.05
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGK107G73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)9 March 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speedUp to 710 MHz560 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate22.696.720
Floating-point processing power0.5445 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs3212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\GDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 64.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 645M 2.42
+317%
7600 GT 0.58

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 645M 934
+317%
7600 GT 224

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30
+329%
7−8
−329%
Full HD23
+360%
5−6
−360%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Hitman 3 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Hitman 3 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Hitman 3 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1

This is how GT 645M and 7600 GT compete in popular games:

  • GT 645M is 329% faster in 900p
  • GT 645M is 360% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.42 0.58
Recency 1 October 2012 9 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 40 Watt

GT 645M has a 317.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 645M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 645M is a notebook card while GeForce 7600 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
GeForce GT 645M
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT
GeForce 7600 GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 96 votes

Rate GeForce GT 645M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 175 votes

Rate GeForce 7600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.