GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) vs GT 640M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	844	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	no data
GPU code name	N13P-GS	MCP79MX
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	14 October 2008 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	16
CUDA cores	384	no data
Core clock speed	Up to 625 MHz	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	645 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,270 million	282 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	32 Watt	12 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.00	no data
Floating-point performance	0.48 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3\GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1800 - 4000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	Up to 64.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	-
Optimus	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	10.0
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	22 March 2012	14 October 2008
Chip lithography	28 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	32 Watt	12 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---