UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs GeForce GT 640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 610 GT 610 PCI GT 620 GT 625 OEM GT 630 GT 630 OEM GT 630 Rev. 2 GT 635 OEM GT 640 GT 640 OEM GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 645 OEM
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 640
2012
2 GB DDR3, 65 Watt
3.05

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) outperforms GT 640 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 640 GT 640
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking764738
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.20no data
Power efficiency3.24no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGK107Rocket Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 June 2012 (12 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Core clock speed902 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate28.86no data
Floating-point processing power0.6927 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed891 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 640 3.05
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 3.29
+7.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 640 1560
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2175
+39.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−21.4%
17
+21.4%
1440p5−6
−20%
6
+20%
4K8−9
−12.5%
9
+12.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.07no data
1440p19.80no data
4K12.38no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 64
+0%
64
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 51
+0%
51
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
+0%
13
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GT 640 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 21% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 20% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 13% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.05 3.29
Recency 5 June 2012 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has a 7.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GT 640 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake).

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
GeForce GT 640
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640 GeForce GT 640
vs
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
vs
Iris Graphics 540 Iris Graphics 540
GT 640 GeForce GT 640
vs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Iris Pro Graphics 5200
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
vs
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
Redwood Redwood
vs
RTX 3070 SUPER GeForce RTX 3070 SUPER
Xbox Series S GPU Xbox Series S GPU
vs
A100 SXM4 40 GB A100 SXM4 40 GB
ATI IGP 320 Radeon IGP 320
vs
MX450 N18S-G5 GeForce MX450 N18S-G5
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
HD 7450 OEM Radeon HD 7450 OEM
7300 GT GeForce 7300 GT
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo 3D Rage PRO Turbo
vs
A800 PCIe 40 GB A800 PCIe 40 GB
Quadro4 750 XGL Quadro4 750 XGL
vs
Pro V520 Radeon Pro V520
GeForce 820M GeForce 820M
vs
RTX 3090 GeForce RTX 3090

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 1540 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.