ATI Radeon IGP 350M vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

GT 610 GT 610 PCI GT 620 GT 625 OEM GT 630 GT 630 OEM GT 635 OEM GT 640 GT 640 OEM GT 640 OEM Rebrand GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 645 OEM
VS
Radeon IGP 320M Radeon IGP 330M Radeon IGP 340M Radeon IGP 345M Radeon IGP 350M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 with Radeon IGP 350M, including specs and performance data.

GT 640 Rev. 2
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 49 Watt
3.55
+17650%

GT 640 Rev. 2 outperforms ATI IGP 350M by a whopping 17650% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
ATI IGP 350M IGP 350M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7221496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency5.05no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGK208RS200
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 May 2013 (11 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1046 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors915 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Wattno data
Texture fill rate33.470.37
Floating-point processing power0.8033 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs322

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8AGP 4x
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1252 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.55 0.02
Recency 29 May 2013 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

GT 640 Rev. 2 has a 17650% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 350M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while Radeon IGP 350M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
ATI Radeon IGP 350M
Radeon IGP 350M
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 4870 Radeon HD 4870
ATI IGP 350M Radeon IGP 350M
vs
FX Go 5200 GeForce FX Go 5200
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
Radeon 540 Radeon 540
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 9800 SE Radeon 9800 SE
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI VE Radeon VE
ATI Mobility Mobility Radeon
vs
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI IGP 345M Radeon IGP 345M
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI IGP 320 Radeon IGP 320
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
ATI HD 3450 Radeon HD 3450
ATI HD 3450 Radeon HD 3450
vs
GTX 645 OEM GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GTX 645 OEM GeForce GTX 645 OEM
vs
E9171 MCM Radeon E9171 MCM
GTX 645 OEM GeForce GTX 645 OEM
vs
R7 M520 Radeon R7 M520

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 27 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 9 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.