GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs GT 640 Rev. 2

Place in the ranking	723	311
Place by popularity	not in top-100	27
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.19	36.69
Power efficiency	5.04	13.54
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GK208	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	29 May 2013 (11 years ago)	27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$89	$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3050 4 GB has 19211% better value for money than GT 640 Rev. 2.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2048
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	1545 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1740 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	90 Watt
Texture fill rate	33.47	111.4
Floating-point processing power	0.8033 TFLOPS	7.127 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	32	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	145 mm	242 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1252 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.06 GB/s	192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	3.5	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.55	17.51
Recency	29 May 2013	27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	90 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has 83.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 4 GB, on the other hand, has a 393.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.