GeForce GT 520 vs GT 640 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
805A 810A GT 630 Rev. 2 GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GT 635 OEM GT 640 GT 640 OEM GT 640 OEM Rebrand GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 730A GT 740A GK208
VS
510 OEM 605 OEM 800A GT 520 GT 520 PCI GT 610 GT 610 PCI GT 620 OEM GT 625 OEM GT 705 OEM GT 710 PCI GF119

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and GeForce GT 520, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 640 Rev. 2
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 49 Watt
3.55
+344%

GT 640 Rev. 2 outperforms GT 520 by a whopping 344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
GT 520 GT 520

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking7221146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.190.01
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK208GF119
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 May 2013 (11 years ago)13 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 $59

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 640 Rev. 2 has 1800% better value for money than GT 520.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38448
CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed1046 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors915 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data102 °C
Texture fill rate33.476.480
Floating-point performance0.8033 gflops0.1555 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm145 mm
Heightno data2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB (DDR3)
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5008 MHz900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGADual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.2
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.55 0.80
Recency 29 May 2013 13 April 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 29 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has a 343.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 520, on the other hand, has 69% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
GeForce GT 520
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 4870 Radeon HD 4870
GT 520 GeForce GT 520
vs
GT 610 GeForce GT 610
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
Radeon 540 Radeon 540
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GT 630 OEM GeForce GT 630 OEM
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GT 630 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 5570 Radeon HD 5570
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 4650 AGP Radeon HD 4650 AGP
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GTS 240 OEM GeForce GTS 240 OEM
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GT 240M LE GeForce GT 240M LE
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 744 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.