GeForce 9500M GE vs GT 640 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking935not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.33no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK107MCP79Mx + NB9M
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)9 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38424
Core clock speed797 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate25.50no data
Floating-point processing power0.6121 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2012 9 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

GT 640 OEM has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

9500M GE, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 OEM and GeForce 9500M GE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 OEM is a desktop card while GeForce 9500M GE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GeForce GT 640 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
GeForce 9500M GE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500M GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.