Radeon RX 6500M vs GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated272
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data28.09
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF116Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1441024
Core clock speed720 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate17.28153.6
Floating-point processing power0.4147 TFLOPS4.915 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs2464
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s144.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2012 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

RX 6500M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand and Radeon RX 6500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6500M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
AMD Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 512 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.