ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI vs GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF116RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144no data
Core clock speed720 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate17.280.8
Floating-point processing power0.4147 TFLOPSno data
ROPs244
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2012 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 28 Watt

GT 640 OEM Rebrand has an age advantage of 9 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE PCI, on the other hand, has 167.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand and Radeon 9200 SE PCI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI
Radeon 9200 SE PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 9200 SE PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.