NVS 310 vs GeForce GT 635M

Place in the ranking	994	1190
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.03
Power efficiency	2.84	2.23
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GF116	GF119
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	26 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	Up to 144	48
Core clock speed	Up to 675 MHz	523 MHz
Boost clock speed	753 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,170 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	20 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.20	4.184
Floating-point processing power	0.3888 TFLOPS	0.1004 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	24	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	156 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	Up to 192bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	875 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 43.2 GB/s	14 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	-
Optimus	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 635M 1.45
+123%

NVS 310 0.65

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 635M 557
+122%

NVS 310 251

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 635M 2537
+188%

NVS 310 880

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

24
+140%

10−12

−140%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

15.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+300%

1−2

−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%