ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI vs GeForce GT 635M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking990not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.87no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameGF116Rage Pro Turbo
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresUp to 144no data
Core clock speedUp to 675 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed753 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,170 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate16.200.08
Floating-point processing power0.3888 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs241

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 MB
Memory bus widthUp to 192bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 43.2 GB/s600 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DB13W3
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.1
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 1 March 1997
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 350 nm

GT 635M has an age advantage of 15 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 635M and 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 635M is a notebook card while 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GeForce GT 635M
ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 463 votes

Rate GeForce GT 635M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.