Quadro P2200 vs GeForce GT 630M

Place in the ranking	1008	234
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.92	22.32
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GF108	GP106
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	10 June 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	1280
Core clock speed	Up to 800 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1493 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.56	119.4
Floating-point processing power	0.2534 TFLOPS	3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	40
TMUs	16	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	201 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3\GDDR5	GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	5 GB
Memory bus width	Up to 128bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 32.0 GB/s	200.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	-
Optimus	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
DirectX 11.2	12 API	no data
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 630M 1.40

Quadro P2200 24.32
+1637%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 630M 537

Quadro P2200 9350
+1641%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 630M 2406

Quadro P2200 32444
+1248%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	19 −1479%	300−350 +1479%
Full HD	16 −1588%	270−280 +1588%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%
Elden Ring	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%
Dota 2	11 −1627%	190−200 +1627%
Elden Ring	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −1627%	190−200 +1627%
Fortnite	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
Grand Theft Auto V	4 −1525%	65−70 +1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24 −1567%	400−450 +1567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%
World of Tanks	35 −1614%	600−650 +1614%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%
Dota 2	22 −1491%	350−400 +1491%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −1627%	190−200 +1627%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −1633%	260−270 +1633%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	8−9 −1525%	130−140 +1525%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1600%	85−90 +1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Valorant	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −1588%	270−280 +1588%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1633%	260−270 +1633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1633%	260−270 +1633%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Dota 2	16−18 −1588%	270−280 +1588%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Valorant	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%

This is how GT 630M and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

Quadro P2200 is 1479% faster in 900p
Quadro P2200 is 1588% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.40	24.32
Recency	22 March 2012	10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	5 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	75 Watt

GT 630M has 127.3% lower power consumption.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has a 1637.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 630M is a notebook card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.