GeForce 7800 GTX 512 vs GT 630M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1005not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.94no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGF108G70
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)14 November 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speedUp to 800 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors585 million302 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt108 Watt
Texture fill rate10.5612.00
Floating-point processing power0.2534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data228 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\GDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus widthUp to 128bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 32.0 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
DirectX 11.212 APIno data
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 14 November 2005
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 108 Watt

GT 630M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 175% more advanced lithography process, and 227.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 630M and GeForce 7800 GTX 512. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 630M is a notebook card while GeForce 7800 GTX 512 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GeForce GT 630M
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX 512
GeForce 7800 GTX 512

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 894 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce 7800 GTX 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.