GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GT 620M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 620M with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

GT 620M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.13

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms GT 620M by a whopping 5309% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking107632
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.67
Power efficiency5.1614.45
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF108GA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 August 2012 (12 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores966144
Core clock speedUp to 625 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed715 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors585 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt290 Watt
Texture fill rate10.56339.8
Floating-point processing power0.2534 TFLOPS21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthUp to 128bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 28.8 GB/s608.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 620M 1.13
RTX 3070 Ti 61.12
+5309%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 620M 437
RTX 3070 Ti 23553
+5290%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 620M 934
RTX 3070 Ti 49760
+5230%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 620M 4219
RTX 3070 Ti 120454
+2755%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 620M 738
RTX 3070 Ti 37663
+5007%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 620M 5269
RTX 3070 Ti 208428
+3856%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
−343%
177
+343%
1440p1−2
−9400%
95
+9400%
4K1−2
−6000%
61
+6000%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.38
1440pno data6.31
4Kno data9.82

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5700%
174
+5700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−3320%
171
+3320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2725%
110−120
+2725%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4500%
138
+4500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11100%
110−120
+11100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−7300%
140−150
+7300%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−22700%
220−230
+22700%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2360%
120−130
+2360%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1662%
220−230
+1662%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−3457%
240−250
+3457%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−366%
140−150
+366%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2440%
120−130
+2440%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2725%
110−120
+2725%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3933%
121
+3933%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11100%
110−120
+11100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−7300%
140−150
+7300%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−22700%
220−230
+22700%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2360%
120−130
+2360%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1662%
220−230
+1662%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4414%
316
+4414%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1073%
120−130
+1073%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−366%
140−150
+366%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1960%
103
+1960%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2725%
110−120
+2725%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3600%
111
+3600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11100%
110−120
+11100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−22700%
220−230
+22700%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2360%
120−130
+2360%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1769%
243
+1769%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−3814%
274
+3814%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1236%
147
+1236%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−238%
108
+238%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−13500%
130−140
+13500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−9200%
93
+9200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7200%
73
+7200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7000%
70−75
+7000%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1157%
85−90
+1157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−4500%
184
+4500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 100−110
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−4560%
230−240
+4560%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2500%
100−110
+2500%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 55−60

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5700%
58
+5700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 45−50
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 40−45
Far Cry 5 0−1 40−45

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 135
+0%
135
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 205
+0%
205
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 119
+0%
119
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 46
+0%
46
+0%

This is how GT 620M and RTX 3070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is 343% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 9400% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 6000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti is 22700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is ahead in 46 tests (69%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (31%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.13 61.12
Recency 23 August 2012 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 290 Watt

GT 620M has 1833.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 5308.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 620M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 620M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GeForce GT 620M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 446 votes

Rate GeForce GT 620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6102 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.