RTX A5000 vs GeForce GT 555M

Place in the ranking	928	36
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.36	17.90
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GF106	GA102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	27 October 2011 (13 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	Up to 144	8192
Core clock speed	Up to 753 MHz	1170 MHz
Boost clock speed	753 MHz	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.60	433.9
Floating-point processing power	0.3024 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	96
TMUs	24	256
Tensor Cores	no data	256
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3\DDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	Up to 192 bit/128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 1569 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 50.2 GB/s	768.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	-
3D Gaming	+	-
Optimus	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 555M 1.69

RTX A5000 59.21
+3404%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 555M 654

RTX A5000 22847
+3393%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 555M 2860

RTX A5000 154456
+5301%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	19 −3321%	650−700 +3321%
Full HD	24 −3233%	800−850 +3233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
−3400%

140−150

+3400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −3329%	240−250 +3329%
Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −3400%	210−220 +3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −3338%	550−600 +3338%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3233%	100−105 +3233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −3233%	300−310 +3233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −3282%	1150−1200 +3282%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −3329%	240−250 +3329%
Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −3400%	210−220 +3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −3338%	550−600 +3338%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3233%	100−105 +3233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −3233%	300−310 +3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −3233%	400−450 +3233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −3282%	1150−1200 +3282%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −3329%	240−250 +3329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −3400%	210−220 +3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −3338%	550−600 +3338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −3233%	300−310 +3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −3233%	400−450 +3233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −3282%	1150−1200 +3282%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
−3233%

100−105

+3233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Hitman 3	7−8 −3329%	240−250 +3329%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −3233%	300−310 +3233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−3400%

140−150

+3400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−3400%

35−40
+3400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
−3233%

100−105

+3233%

This is how GT 555M and RTX A5000 compete in popular games:

RTX A5000 is 3321% faster in 900p
RTX A5000 is 3233% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.69	59.21
Recency	27 October 2011	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	230 Watt

GT 555M has 557.1% lower power consumption.

RTX A5000, on the other hand, has a 3403.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 555M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 555M is a notebook card while RTX A5000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.