Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GeForce GT 525M

Place in the ranking	1058	50
Place by popularity	not in top-100	81
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	57.85
Power efficiency	3.58	15.61
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GF108	Navi 22
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	5 January 2011 (13 years ago)	3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	2560
Core clock speed	475 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.600	413.0
Floating-point processing power	0.1824 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	16	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 525M 1.18

RX 6700 XT 51.53
+4267%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 525M 457

RX 6700 XT 19876
+4249%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 525M 799

RX 6700 XT 45676
+5617%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 525M 3840

RX 6700 XT 109039
+2740%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 525M 630

RX 6700 XT 35504
+5536%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	13 −4131%	550−600 +4131%
Full HD	20 −695%	159 +695%
1440p	1−2 −8600%	87 +8600%
4K	1−2 −5000%	51 +5000%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.01
1440p	no data	5.51
4K	no data	9.39

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−3867%

119
+3867%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −2060%	100−110 +2060%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3200%	99 +3200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −10200%	100−110 +10200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −4067%	120−130 +4067%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −21400%	210−220 +21400%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2200%	138 +2200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1336%	200−210 +1336%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −5300%	100−110 +5300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −2413%	200−210 +2413%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −347%	140−150 +347%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −2060%	100−110 +2060%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2900%	90 +2900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −10200%	100−110 +10200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −4067%	120−130 +4067%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −21400%	210−220 +21400%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2167%	136 +2167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1336%	200−210 +1336%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −5300%	100−110 +5300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −3413%	281 +3413%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −873%	100−110 +873%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −347%	140−150 +347%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −2060%	100−110 +2060%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2733%	85 +2733%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −10200%	100−110 +10200%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −21400%	210−220 +21400%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2150%	135 +2150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1279%	193 +1279%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −2900%	240 +2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1055%	127 +1055%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −163%	84 +163%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−5300%

100−110
+5300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −10500%	100−110 +10500%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −3900%	80−85 +3900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −5700%	55−60 +5700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	60−65
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −5500%	56 +5500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −5900%	60−65 +5900%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1086%	83 +1086%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −3525%	145 +3525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	80−85
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −4300%	220−230 +4300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−2125%

85−90
+2125%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

45−50

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −3700%	35−40 +3700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −4700%	48 +4700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	35−40
Far Cry 5	0−1	30−35

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2350%

45−50
+2350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	169 +0%	169 +0%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	144 +0%	144 +0%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

125

+0%

125

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	109 +0%	109 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%
Metro Exodus	123 +0%	123 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	173 +0%	173 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Hitman 3	48 +0%	48 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +0%	74 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	25 +0%	25 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	93 +0%	93 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35 +0%	35 +0%

This is how GT 525M and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6700 XT is 4131% faster in 900p
RX 6700 XT is 695% faster in 1080p
RX 6700 XT is 8600% faster in 1440p
RX 6700 XT is 5000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6700 XT is 21400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6700 XT is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.18	51.53
Recency	5 January 2011	3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	230 Watt

GT 525M has 900% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 4266.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 525M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 525M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.