ATI FireGL X2-256T vs GeForce GT 525M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1052not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.58no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGF108R360
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed475 MHz412 MHz
Number of transistors585 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.6003.296
Floating-point processing power0.1824 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz344 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s22.02 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

GT 525M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 525M and FireGL X2-256T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 525M is a notebook card while FireGL X2-256T is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
GeForce GT 525M
ATI FireGL X2-256T
FireGL X2-256T

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 344 votes

Rate GeForce GT 525M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL X2-256T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.