GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs GT 520

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 520 with GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GT 520
2011
1 GB (DDR3) DDR3, 29 Watt
0.80

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 520 by a whopping 5656% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking110564
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGF119GN20-E8
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 April 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59 no data
Current price$88 (1.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores487424
CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed810 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1590 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature102 °Cno data
Texture fill rate6.5 billion/sec292.3
Floating-point performance155.52 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 520 and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length5.7" (14.5 cm)no data
Height2.7" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB (DDR3)16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz (DDR3)14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)No outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 520 0.80
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 46.05
+5656%

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 520 by 5656% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 520 380
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 31033
+8067%

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 520 by 8067% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−6900%
140
+6900%
1440p1−2
−8700%
88
+8700%
4K0−157

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 136
−5635%
7800−7850
+5635%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−5605%
4450−4500
+5605%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 118
−5620%
6750−6800
+5620%
Battlefield 5 140−150
−5648%
8450−8500
+5648%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−5607%
5250−5300
+5607%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
−5626%
7100−7150
+5626%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−5629%
5500−5550
+5629%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
−5614%
6400−6450
+5614%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−5627%
9450−9500
+5627%
Hitman 3 162
−5641%
9300−9350
+5641%
Horizon Zero Dawn 287
−5649%
16500−16550
+5649%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−5632%
7050−7100
+5632%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−5614%
6000−6050
+5614%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 277
−5640%
15900−15950
+5640%
Watch Dogs: Legion 125
−5620%
7150−7200
+5620%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−5605%
4450−4500
+5605%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
−5650%
5750−5800
+5650%
Battlefield 5 140−150
−5648%
8450−8500
+5648%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−5607%
5250−5300
+5607%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
−5635%
5850−5900
+5635%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−5629%
5500−5550
+5629%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
−5614%
6400−6450
+5614%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−5627%
9450−9500
+5627%
Hitman 3 80
−5650%
4600−4650
+5650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−5641%
10850−10900
+5641%
Metro Exodus 54
−5641%
3100−3150
+5641%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−5614%
6000−6050
+5614%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 229
−5642%
13150−13200
+5642%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223
−5640%
12800−12850
+5640%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−5648%
6150−6200
+5648%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−5605%
4450−4500
+5605%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
−5647%
5000−5050
+5647%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−5607%
5250−5300
+5607%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
−5614%
5200−5250
+5614%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−5629%
5500−5550
+5629%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−5627%
9450−9500
+5627%
Horizon Zero Dawn 194
−5647%
11150−11200
+5647%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200
−5650%
11500−11550
+5650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
−5620%
6750−6800
+5620%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
−5614%
4800−4850
+5614%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−5614%
6000−6050
+5614%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−5614%
5200−5250
+5614%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−5634%
6250−6300
+5634%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−5586%
2900−2950
+5586%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
−5614%
4000−4050
+5614%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−5594%
4100−4150
+5594%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
−5614%
3200−3250
+5614%
Far Cry 5 116
−5633%
6650−6700
+5633%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−5607%
5650−5700
+5607%
Hitman 3 107
−5648%
6150−6200
+5648%
Horizon Zero Dawn 154
−5647%
8850−8900
+5647%
Metro Exodus 93
−5653%
5350−5400
+5653%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150
−5633%
8600−8650
+5633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
−5656%
4950−5000
+5656%
Watch Dogs: Legion 67
−5646%
3850−3900
+5646%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−5650%
4600−4650
+5650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−5629%
2750−2800
+5629%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−5650%
2300−2350
+5650%
Hitman 3 35−40
−5558%
2150−2200
+5558%
Horizon Zero Dawn 84
−5614%
4800−4850
+5614%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 72
−5594%
4100−4150
+5594%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
−5606%
4850−4900
+5606%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−5506%
1850−1900
+5506%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
−5629%
2750−2800
+5629%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−5545%
1750−1800
+5545%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
−5614%
1600−1650
+5614%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−5614%
1600−1650
+5614%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−5582%
3750−3800
+5582%
Horizon Zero Dawn 88
−5639%
5050−5100
+5639%
Metro Exodus 73
−5653%
4200−4250
+5653%
Watch Dogs: Legion 42
−5614%
2400−2450
+5614%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−5614%
2400−2450
+5614%

This is how GT 520 and RTX 3080 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 6900% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 8700% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 46.05
Recency 13 April 2011 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB (DDR3) 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 150 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 520 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
GeForce GT 520
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 687 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 251 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.