GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs GT 445M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 445M with GeForce RTX 2080 Super, including specs and performance data.

GT 445M
2010
3 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
2.10

RTX 2080 Super outperforms GT 445M by a whopping 2316% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking86954
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.30
Power efficiency4.1514.03
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF106TU104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)23 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1443072
Core clock speed590 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1815 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate14.16348.5
Floating-point processing power0.3398 TFLOPS11.15 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs24192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/s495.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 445M 2.10
RTX 2080 Super 50.73
+2316%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 445M 811
RTX 2080 Super 19570
+2313%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 445M 1148
RTX 2080 Super 40963
+3468%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
−2268%
450−500
+2268%
Full HD32
−338%
140
+338%
1440p3−4
−3033%
94
+3033%
4K2−3
−3400%
70
+3400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.99
1440pno data7.44
4Kno data9.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1760%
90−95
+1760%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1314%
99
+1314%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−9600%
194
+9600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−2017%
127
+2017%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1760%
90−95
+1760%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4600%
141
+4600%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−3300%
170
+3300%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−2856%
266
+2856%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1514%
113
+1514%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−1572%
301
+1572%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2950%
122
+2950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−1880%
198
+1880%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−531%
227
+531%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1929%
142
+1929%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−9000%
182
+9000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1900%
120
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1760%
90−95
+1760%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3633%
112
+3633%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2460%
128
+2460%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−2767%
258
+2767%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1557%
116
+1557%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−1472%
283
+1472%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2400%
100
+2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−2150%
225
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−775%
100−110
+775%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−486%
211
+486%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−871%
68
+871%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1400%
90
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1680%
89
+1680%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2533%
79
+2533%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1378%
133
+1378%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1443%
108
+1443%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−800%
162
+800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−1790%
189
+1790%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−808%
109
+808%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−108%
75
+108%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2850%
118
+2850%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−4367%
134
+4367%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3000%
93
+3000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2800%
58
+2800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−6400%
65
+6400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3400%
70
+3400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1029%
79
+1029%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−2017%
127
+2017%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−8000%
80−85
+8000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−1658%
211
+1658%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−2040%
107
+2040%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 62
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1950%
41
+1950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−3800%
39
+3800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 34

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1900%
60
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+0%
70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 57
+0%
57
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 249
+0%
249
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 141
+0%
141
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 131
+0%
131
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+0%
81
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 82
+0%
82
+0%

This is how GT 445M and RTX 2080 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super is 2268% faster in 900p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 338% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 3033% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 3400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 Super is 9600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super is ahead in 54 tests (77%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.10 50.73
Recency 3 September 2010 23 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

GT 445M has 614.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super, on the other hand, has a 2315.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 445M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 445M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
GeForce GT 445M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 10 votes

Rate GeForce GT 445M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2443 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.