GeForce 7800 GS AGP vs GT 435M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1006not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.76no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGF108G70
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)2 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed650 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors585 million302 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate10.406.000
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API with Feature Level 12.19.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 2 February 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 75 Watt

GT 435M has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 175% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 435M and GeForce 7800 GS AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 435M is a notebook card while GeForce 7800 GS AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
GeForce GT 435M
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GS AGP
GeForce 7800 GS AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GT 435M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 21 vote

Rate GeForce 7800 GS AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.