Arc A770 vs GeForce GT 430

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 430 and Arc A770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 430
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 49 Watt
1.55

Arc A770 outperforms GT 430 by a whopping 2089% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking970155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0555.32
Power efficiency2.1710.34
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF108DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A770 has 110540% better value for money than GT 430.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964096
CUDA cores per GPU96no data
Core clock speed700 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors585 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt225 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate11.20614.4
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs16256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 - 28.8 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 430 1.55
Arc A770 33.93
+2089%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 430 599
Arc A770 13075
+2083%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 430 720
Arc A770 32666
+4437%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−2220%
116
+2220%
1440p2−3
−3150%
65
+3150%
4K1−2
−4000%
41
+4000%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.802.84
1440p39.505.06
4K79.008.02

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−983%
65
+983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−960%
50−55
+960%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3625%
140−150
+3625%
Hitman 3 6−7
−767%
50−55
+767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−687%
110−120
+687%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2133%
65−70
+2133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−878%
85−90
+878%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−209%
100−110
+209%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−417%
31
+417%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−960%
50−55
+960%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3625%
140−150
+3625%
Hitman 3 6−7
−767%
50−55
+767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−687%
110−120
+687%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2133%
65−70
+2133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2767%
258
+2767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−409%
55−60
+409%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−209%
100−110
+209%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−650%
45
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−960%
50−55
+960%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−475%
23
+475%
Hitman 3 6−7
−767%
50−55
+767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−707%
121
+707%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2300%
216
+2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−555%
72
+555%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−118%
74
+118%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2133%
65−70
+2133%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 27−30
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1900%
100
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5900%
60
+5900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−1713%
140−150
+1713%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−975%
40−45
+975%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1400%
30
+1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3700%
38
+3700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 14−16
Far Cry 5 0−1 14−16

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−633%
21−24
+633%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+0%
79
+0%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
+0%
72
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 158
+0%
158
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 83
+0%
83
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+0%
73
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+0%
8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 89
+0%
89
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 37
+0%
37
+0%

This is how GT 430 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 2220% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 3150% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 4000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A770 is 5900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 33.93
Recency 11 October 2010 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 225 Watt

GT 430 has 359.2% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 2089% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 430 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GeForce GT 430
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1127 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5320 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.