RTX A3000 Mobile vs GeForce GT 420M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 420M with RTX A3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GT 420M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 23 Watt
1.03

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms GT 420M by a whopping 3043% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1096166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.2333.36
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF108GA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964096
Core clock speed500 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1230 MHz
Number of transistors585 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000157.4
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS10.08 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs16128
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s264.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 420M 1.03
RTX A3000 Mobile 32.37
+3043%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 420M 397
RTX A3000 Mobile 12492
+3047%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 420M 3051
RTX A3000 Mobile 71308
+2237%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 420M 685
RTX A3000 Mobile 25990
+3694%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Full HD17
−494%
101
+494%
1440p1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%
4K1−2
−4500%
46
+4500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2467%
77
+2467%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2100%
66
+2100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7200%
70−75
+7200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4050%
80−85
+4050%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 170−180
Hitman 3 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−992%
140−150
+992%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1543%
110−120
+1543%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−269%
110−120
+269%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1667%
53
+1667%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7200%
70−75
+7200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4050%
80−85
+4050%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 170−180
Hitman 3 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−992%
140−150
+992%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1814%
134
+1814%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−518%
65−70
+518%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−269%
110−120
+269%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1333%
43
+1333%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7200%
70−75
+7200%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 170−180
Hitman 3 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−777%
114
+777%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1529%
114
+1529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−455%
61
+455%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−21.9%
39
+21.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%
Hitman 3 7−8
−486%
40−45
+486%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−1625%
65−70
+1625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 40−45
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−4175%
170−180
+4175%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 27−30

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 18−20
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 20−22
Far Cry 5 0−1 18−20

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+0%
79
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
+0%
68
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
+0%
51
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 86
+0%
86
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
+0%
51
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how GT 420M and RTX A3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 2817% faster in 900p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 494% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 5200% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 4500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 7900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is ahead in 43 tests (67%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (33%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 32.37
Recency 3 September 2010 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 70 Watt

GT 420M has 204.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3042.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 420M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 420M is a notebook graphics card while RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
GeForce GT 420M
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 121 vote

Rate GeForce GT 420M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 124 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.