CMP 40HX vs GeForce GT 415M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 415M with CMP 40HX, including specs and performance data.

GT 415M
2010
512 MB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.74

CMP 40HX outperforms GT 415M by a whopping 2274% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1157306
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.17
Power efficiency4.306.62
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF108TU106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482304
Core clock speed500 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors585 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000237.6
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS7.603 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 415M 0.74
CMP 40HX 17.57
+2274%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 415M 286
CMP 40HX 6778
+2270%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 415M 751
CMP 40HX 95902
+12670%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2264%
260−270
+2264%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2158%
700−750
+2158%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2264%
260−270
+2264%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2200%
230−240
+2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2158%
700−750
+2158%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2264%
260−270
+2264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2200%
230−240
+2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2158%
700−750
+2158%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 17.57
Recency 3 September 2010 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 185 Watt

GT 415M has 1441.7% lower power consumption.

CMP 40HX, on the other hand, has a 2274.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The CMP 40HX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 415M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 415M is a notebook card while CMP 40HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
GeForce GT 415M
NVIDIA CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate GeForce GT 415M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 55 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.