Arc A550M vs GeForce GT 415M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GT 415M and Arc A550M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc A550M outperforms GT 415M by a whopping 3107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 1164 | 231 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Xe HPG (2022−2023) |
GPU code name | N11P-GV | Alchemist |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 3 September 2010 (14 years ago) | 30 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 16 |
CUDA cores | 48 | no data |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2005 MHz |
Number of transistors | 585 million | 21,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 80 Watt (60 - 80 Watt TGP) |
Texture fill rate | 4.000 | 115.2 |
Floating-point performance | 0.096 gflops | 3.686 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | (G)DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1200%
|
35−40
+1200%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−940%
|
50−55
+940%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−1533%
|
45−50
+1533%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1200%
|
35−40
+1200%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−6200%
|
60−65
+6200%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−860%
|
45−50
+860%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−909%
|
110−120
+909%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 60−65 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−1233%
|
80−85
+1233%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−226%
|
100−110
+226%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−940%
|
50−55
+940%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−1533%
|
45−50
+1533%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1200%
|
35−40
+1200%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−6200%
|
60−65
+6200%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−860%
|
45−50
+860%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−909%
|
110−120
+909%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 60−65 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−1233%
|
80−85
+1233%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−420%
|
50−55
+420%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−226%
|
100−110
+226%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−940%
|
50−55
+940%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−1533%
|
45−50
+1533%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1200%
|
35−40
+1200%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−860%
|
45−50
+860%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−909%
|
110−120
+909%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−1233%
|
80−85
+1233%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−420%
|
50−55
+420%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−226%
|
100−110
+226%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 60−65 |
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 45−50 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−3500%
|
35−40
+3500%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 24−27 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1400%
|
14−16
+1400%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2700%
|
27−30
+2700%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7
−367%
|
27−30
+367%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4
−1533%
|
45−50
+1533%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−6700%
|
130−140
+6700%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
4K
High Preset
Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 12−14 |
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A550M is 6700% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc A550M is ahead in 35 tests (55%)
- there's a draw in 29 tests (45%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.74 | 23.73 |
Recency | 3 September 2010 | 30 March 2022 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 8 GB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 80 Watt |
GT 415M has 566.7% lower power consumption.
Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 3106.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc A550M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 415M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.