CMP 40HX vs GeForce GT 320 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated306
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.65
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT215TU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 February 2010 (14 years ago)25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores722304
Core clock speed540 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors727 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate12.96237.6
Floating-point performance0.1875 gflops7.603 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length175 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1580 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth25.28 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.27.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2010 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 185 Watt

GT 320 OEM has 330.2% lower power consumption.

CMP 40HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 320 OEM and CMP 40HX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
GeForce GT 320 OEM
NVIDIA CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 58 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 31 vote

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.