Trace: try redirect_from

Trace: select _id, title from ss_cards where redirect_to=3122

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs GT 240M LE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated220
Place by popularitynot in top-10049
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG96CAmpere GA106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 January 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322560
Core clock speed600 MHz1552 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1777 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate9.600102.0
Floating-point performance0.096 gflops6.53 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.18.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2010 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 130 Watt

GT 240M LE has 465.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 240M LE and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 240M LE is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
GeForce GT 240M LE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 4236 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.