Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs GeForce GT 230

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1141not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG94BGA10B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2009 (15 years ago)February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43.99 $899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481792
Core clock speed650 MHz930 MHz
Number of transistors505 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6052.08
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPS3.333 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs2456
Tensor Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s204.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 40 Watt

Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 and Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 230 is a desktop card while Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
GeForce GT 230
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 64 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.