UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs GeForce GT 220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 220 GT 220 OEM GT 230 GT 230 OEM GT 240 GT 430 GT 610 GT 630 GT 640 GT 710 GT 730 GT 740
VS
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 220 with UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), including specs and performance data.

GT 220
2009
1 GB GDDR3, 58 Watt
0.57

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 296% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 220 GT 220
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1208851
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.6815.64
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameGT216Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2009 (15 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4824
Core clock speed625 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors486 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate9.840no data
Floating-point processing power0.1277 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed790 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADVIHDMIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIF + HDAno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
+90.9%
11
−90.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.81no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−20%
35−40
+20%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−20%
35−40
+20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hitman 3 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+150%
4
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−20%
35−40
+20%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hitman 3 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

This is how GT 220 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:

  • GT 220 is 91% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 220 is 150% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 220 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is ahead in 33 tests (63%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.57 2.26
Recency 12 October 2009 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has a 296.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1350% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 220 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 220 GeForce GT 220
vs
R5 230 Radeon R5 230
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
vs
7600 GT GeForce 7600 GT
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
vs
ATI SDR PCI Radeon SDR PCI
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
vs
GT 330M Mac Edition GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
vs
ATI 9200 SE PCI Radeon 9200 SE PCI
Go 7950 GTX SLI GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
Go 7950 GTX SLI GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
vs
S9300 X2 FirePro S9300 X2
GT 420M GeForce GT 420M
vs
Arc Pro A50 Arc Pro A50
GT 330M GeForce GT 330M
vs
RX Vega 2 Radeon RX Vega 2
NVS 5100M Quadro NVS 5100M
vs
Vega 10 Vega 10
9700M GT GeForce 9700M GT
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GT 230M GeForce GT 230M
vs
GeForce 6200 GeForce 6200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 755 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 49 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.